Post Border Control Policy: Stakeholder Analysis Perspective

Authors

  • Tofa Apriansyah Universitas Indonesia
  • Adis Imam Munandar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31092/craj.v1i1.11

Keywords:

BPOM, DGCE, implementation, post border, Stakeholder analysis

Abstract

The distribution of unregistered Drugs and Foods during the 2015-2017 period—including
illegally imported Drugs and Food—dominates the findings in Drug and Food control,
according to the inspection and investigation of Indonesia National Agency of Drug and
Food Control (BPOM) and Directorate General of Customs and Excise (DGCE). This study
aims to determine stakeholder understanding and analysis in implementing BPOM
Regulation No. 29 of 2017 and BPOM Regulation No. 30 of 2017. The qualitative method
with Stakeholder Analysis is used as an analysis on data obtained through literature studies
and structural official interviews and executive officers at BPOM and DGCE. The results
show that the performance of BPOM Inspection & Certification Officer, BPOM
Investigator, and DGCE Law Enforcement Officer became Definitive Stakeholder in
influencing the implementation of those regulations. Head of Division of BPOM Inspection
and Certification, Head of Division of BPOM Law Enforcement and Head of Division of
DGCE Law Enforcement proved to have enough team strength and authority to become
Dominant Stakeholders. Community, passanger, business actors, importers can become
Dangerous Stakeholders because they have personal and business interests if the
regulations are not clear or consistent enough. It is necessary to form an integrated team
between institutions in order to fight against the entry of illegally imported Drug and Food.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-10